Views provided by UsageCounts
This dataset was prepared for a publication by von Hobe et al. (2023): Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022) In that publication, the data are displayed in Figure 4. The dataset contains additional stratospheric aerosol forcing for injections of 6 Tg S a-1 OCS for several years over 5 tropical cities at the tropopause (97 hPa) calculated with the EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry) CCM (e.g. Brühl et al., 2018; Schallock et al., 2023). Data are given for a four year time series starting in January 2017. - - - - - - - - - - - - File format: netCDF Index Variables: time, 10 hourly, as 'day since 1997-01-01' (note that the two variables named time4 and time6 are identical) Parameters: SOLFORCCSO: instantaneous solar radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere by aerosol due to continuous OCS injection near the tropical tropopause with surface mixing ratios of OCS were fixed to observations TOTFORCCSO: instantaneous total radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere by aerosol due to continuous OCS injection near the tropical tropopause with surface mixing ratios of OCS were fixed to observations SOLFORCCSO_FREE: instantaneous solar radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere by aerosol due to continuous OCS injection near the tropical tropopause with surface mixing ratios of OCS allowed to increase from downward transport TOTFORCCSO_FREE: instantaneous total radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere by aerosol due to continuous OCS injection near the tropical tropopause with surface mixing ratios of OCS allowed to increase from downward transport - - - - - - - - - - - - References: Brühl, C., Schallock, J., Klingmüller, K., Robert, C., Bingen, C., Clarisse, L., Heckel, A., North, P., and Rieger, L.: Stratospheric aerosol radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC using Aerosol CCI satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12845-12857, 10.5194/acp-18-12845-2018, 2018 Quaglia, I., Visioni, D., Pitari, G., and Kravitz, B.: An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5757-5773, 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022, 2022. Schallock, J., Brühl, C., Bingen, C., Höpfner, M., Rieger, L., and Lelieveld, J.: Reconstructing volcanic radiative forcing since 1990, using a comprehensive emission inventory and spatially resolved sulfur injections from satellite data in a chemistry climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1169-1207, 10.5194/acp-23-1169-2023, 2023. von Hobe, M., Brühl, C., Lennartz, S. T., Whelan, M. E., and Kaushik, A.: Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022) , EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-268, 2023.
Carbonyl Sulfide, Stratospheric Aerosol, Geoengineering Scenarios, Radiative Forcing
Carbonyl Sulfide, Stratospheric Aerosol, Geoengineering Scenarios, Radiative Forcing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts