This dataset was prepared for a publication by von Hobe et al. (2023): Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022) In that publication, the data are displayed in Figures 1 and 2. Simple Biosphere model version 4.2 (SiB4, Haynes et al., 2019; Sellers et al., 1986) was used to calculate (i) the average increase in evapotranspiration anticipated under an elevated OCS scenario for the years 2000-2021 on a 0.5 ° latitude x 0.5 ° longitude grid and (ii) OCS uptake by plants and soils, per month, at baseline (500 ppt) and elevated (4.8 and 35.5 ppb) OCS levels averaged over the years 2000-2021. - - - - - - - - - - - File 1: vonHobe_et_al_2023_CarbonylSulfideGeoengineeringScenarios_DeltaEvapotranspiration_GloballyGridded_SiB4.nc File Format: netCDF Index Variables: latitude longitude Parameters: percent_diff_et: relative increase in % of evapotranspiration in a scenario where 20% of terrestrial plants exhibit a 50% increase in stomatal conductance under high OCS - - - - - - File 2: vonHobe_et_al_2023_CarbonylSulfideGeoengineeringScenarios_BiosphereUptake_MonthlyIntegrated_SiB4.csv File Format: comma delimited text file (.csv) Index Variable: time: monthly, format m/dd/yy Parameters: ocs_veg_base: simulated monthly OCS uptake by terrestrial vegetation at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 500 ppt ocs_soil_base: simulated monthly OCS uptake by soils at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 500 ppt ocs_veg_4.8ppb: simulated monthly OCS uptake by terrestrial vegetation at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 4.8 ppb ocs_soil_4.8ppb: simulated monthly OCS uptake by soils at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 4.8 ppb ocs_veg_35.5ppb: simulated monthly OCS uptake by terrestrial vegetation at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 35.5 ppb ocs_soil_35.5ppb: simulated monthly OCS uptake by soils at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 35.5 ppb - - - - - - - - - - - References: Haynes, K. D., Baker, I. T., Denning, A. S., Stöckli, R., Schaefer, K., Lokupitiya, E. Y., and Haynes, J. M.: Representing Grasslands Using Dynamic Prognostic Phenology Based on Biological Growth Stages: 1. Implementation in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4), Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 4423-4439, 10.1029/2018ms001540, 2019. Quaglia, I., Visioni, D., Pitari, G., and Kravitz, B.: An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5757-5773, 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022, 2022. Sellers, P. J., Mintz, Y., Sud, Y. C., and Salcher, A.: A Simple Biosphere Model (SiB) for Use within General Circulation Models, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 43, 505-531, 1986. von Hobe, M., Brühl, C., Lennartz, S. T., Whelan, M. E., and Kaushik, A.: Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022) ,

Aleya Kaushik was supported by NOAA cooperative agreement NA22OAR4320151. Mary Whelan was supported by NASA ECOSTRESS award number 80NSSC20K0215.