Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 genomic loci for breast cancer risk, but specific causal genes in most of these loci have not been identified. In fact, transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) of breast cancer performed using gene expression prediction models trained in breast tissue have yet to clearly identify most target genes. To identify novel candidate genes, we performed a joint TWAS analysis that combined TWAS signals from multiple tissues. We used expression prediction models trained in 47 tissues from the Genotype-Tissue Expression data using a multivariate adaptive shrinkage method along with association summary statistics from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium and UK Biobank data. We identified 380 genes at 129 genomic loci to be significantly associated with breast cancer at the Bonferroni threshold (p < 2.36 × 10 −6 ). Of them, 29 genes were located in 11 novel regions that were at least 1Mb away from published GWAS hits. The rest of TWAS-significant genes were located in 118 known genomic loci from previous GWAS of breast cancer. After conditioning on previous GWAS index variants, we found that 22 genes located in known GWAS loci remained statistically significant. Our study maps potential target genes in more than half of known GWAS loci and discovers multiple new loci, providing new insights into breast cancer genetics.
transcriptome-wide association study; multiple tissues; GWAS; meta-analysis; breast cancer
transcriptome-wide association study; multiple tissues; GWAS; meta-analysis; breast cancer
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 73 | |
| downloads | 53 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts