Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ResearchGate Data
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: Datacite
ResearchGate Data
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: Datacite
ResearchGate Data
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: Datacite
ResearchGate Data
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 8 versions
addClaim

Hybrid Consensus Mechanism (HCM) : Achieving Efficient and Secure Consensus in Blockchain Networks

Authors: Jha, Akash Kumar;

Hybrid Consensus Mechanism (HCM) : Achieving Efficient and Secure Consensus in Blockchain Networks

Abstract

Consensus mechanisms play a critical role in blockchain networks, ensuring that all participants agree on the state of the distributed ledger. However, existing consensus mechanisms have limitations in terms of efficiency, security, and decentralization. In this research paper, we propose a Hybrid Consensus Mechanism (HCM) that combines the advantages of Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT), and Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET) to address these limitations. HCM uses a set of trusted validators (delegates) similar to DPoS, who participate in a PBFT-like consensus protocol to reach agreement on the state of the ledger. PoET is used to randomly select the leader for each consensus round, preventing the concentration of power. HCM also introduces a dynamic delegation mechanism and sharding technique to enhance fairness, resilience, and scalability in blockchain networks. We provide detailed technical insights, backed by underlying data, to illustrate the effectiveness of HCM in achieving efficient and secure consensus.

Keywords

Hybrid Consensus Mechanism, DPoS, PBFT, PoET, decentralization, scalability, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Consensus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
    download downloads 10
  • 9
    views
    10
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
9
10
Green