Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Even though Germany has been an attractive location for foreign investors for many years and foreign subsidiaries in Germany create a significant number of jobs on an intermediate qualification level, whether and how these foreign companies act regarding training at their German locations is largely unknown. Therefore the paper asks the question how multinational companies, which are socialized in differing skill-formation systems, practice training in their subsidiaries in Germany, where the German dual apprenticeship system is predominant. The focus lies on multinational companies from France, Japan and the United States, as these countries are significant in terms of direct investments in Germany and as the selection follows a ‘most different design’ regarding their respective skill-formation system. Qualitative methods, i.e. expert interviews and a qualitative content analysis, were used in order to adequately reflect the explorative approach of the study. Using neo-institutionalist organisational theory, the study first examines how companies act in the area of training and recruiting on the intermediate skill level and second how they are influenced by the two different country environments. The differing training practices of foreign multinational companies in Germany are presented, and the influence of environmental conditions on adaptation towards local practices is discussed.
330, multinational companies, German dual apprenticeship system, ddc:300, 370, ddc:370, foreign subsidiaries in Germany, 300, training practices, 510
330, multinational companies, German dual apprenticeship system, ddc:300, 370, ddc:370, foreign subsidiaries in Germany, 300, training practices, 510
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 112 | |
| downloads | 45 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts