Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Massively parallel screens to identify splice disruptive variants in human disease genes

Authors: Smith, CS;

Massively parallel screens to identify splice disruptive variants in human disease genes

Abstract

Splicing is a critical step in mRNA maturation with roles in gene regulation and proteome diversification. Splice disruptive variants (SDVs) are implicated in diverse human diseases, and 10-33% of exonic variants may disrupt splicing. However, identifying SDVs remains challenging due to the degeneracy and redundancy of the underlying sequence code. Experimental splicing measurements from patient cells or mini-gene assays can detect SDVs but have traditionally been low-throughput. Massively parallel reporter assays (MPSAs) systematically measure splicing impacts at scale and could clarify variant pathogenicity and inform models of splicing regulation. In this assay, complex barcoded libraries of mutant exons are synthesized, cloned into minigene constructs, and transfected into human cells. Splicing outcomes of each mutation are quantified en masse using targeted RNA-seq of minigene-derived transcripts, and I developed custom python package to process the resulting data. In Chapter 2, I apply this assay to the pituitary transcription factor gene POU1F1 (in collaboration Dr. Sally Camper’s lab). Mutations in POU1F1 cause combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD), a clinically and genetically heterogenous disorder with prevalence ~1:4000. We targeted exon 2, which has two alterative isoforms (alpha and beta) using competing splice acceptors that encode mutually antagonistic proteins. We measured the splicing effects of 1,070 SNVs across the exon and surrounding introns and identified 96 SDVs - 14 of which were synonymous substitutions. Our measurements were concordant with six nearby heterozygous missense and synonymous variants seen in unrelated hypopituitarism patients. This map identifies a putative splice silencer motif that represses the use of the normally lowly expressed beta isoform. In Chapter 3, I apply a MPSA to a critical developmental renal transcription factor gene, WT1 (in collaboration with clinical nephrologist Dr. Jen Lai Yee). Mutations in WT1 are implicated in nephrotic syndrome and sexual differentiation phenotypes. I focus on exon 9 which is alternatively spliced at competing donor sites resulting in two isoforms (KTS+ and KTS-). KTS+ and KTS- are normally expressed in ~2:1 ratio, but perturbation of the ratio can lead to Frasier’s syndrome – a rare nephrotic syndrome. We tested 518 SNVs for splicing defects and identified 8 known Frasier’s Syndrome variants as well as 16 additional variants that similarly lowered the KTS ratio. We also detected 19 variants increasing the KTS ratio - two of which have been observed in patients with sexual differentiation phenotypes. Although MPSAs can measure splicing effects of hundreds of variants simultaneously, the current scale of variant discovery via exome and genome sequencing demands efficient and accurate computational approaches to identify splice disruptive variants genome-wide. To evaluate the state of the art within contemporary splice prediction algorithms, in Chapter 4 I employed the results of five high throughput splicing assays and one literature curated variant set. A unique advantage of MPSAs over typical training and validation datasets is that they avoid bias towards essential splice site variants. I found the latest deep learning tools, SpliceAI and Pangolin, were most concordant with the measured splicing effects. However, all tools showed less agreement with exonic splicing outcomes compared to intronic. Some tools’ predictions, like SpliceAI’s, were sensitive to specified annotation files. Thus, there is still room for improvement within the next generation of splice prediction algorithms which future MPSA studies may facilitate.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 17
  • 17
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
17