Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2011
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2011
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

An Audit Investigating The Usefulness Of A Hospital-Based 4-Week First Postoperative Review Following Routine Cataract Surgery

Authors: Porter, Louise F.; Smith, Amy; Showman, Aaron D.; Sadiq, S. Ahmed;

An Audit Investigating The Usefulness Of A Hospital-Based 4-Week First Postoperative Review Following Routine Cataract Surgery

Abstract

Aim: Timing of postoperative review after routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery in the English National Health Service is not specified in the Royal College of Ophthalmologists Cataract Surgery Guidelines. There are wide variations in when the first postoperative review occurs in routine practice. This audit assesses the usefulness of a 4-week first postoperative review in the hospital setting, in the context of high volume routine cataract surgery. Setting: Manchester Royal Eye Hospital cataract treatment centre based at Withington Hospital, UK. Methods: Retrospective review of 200 consecutive sets of case notes of patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery with standard 4-week postoperative review using a proforma. Results: 88% of patients were discharged at the 4-week review for this episode. 4.5% of patients required earlier unplanned review. 16.5% of patients experienced a postoperative problem, anterior uveitis was the commonest complication. 15% of patients were referred from the postoperative clinic for investigation or continuing management of co-existing ocular disease. Conclusions: A four-week hospital-based first post-operative review following routine cataract surgery does not serve the purpose of treating sight-threatening complications. A substantial proportion of routine cataract surgery patients (88%) were discharged at this review. A routine 4-week follow-up review may therefore not be required within a hospital setting in many cases. It would be a reasonably safe option to consider early discharge of such patients to an accredited community optometrist for routine postoperative review and refraction in the presence of careful patient selection and good access to emergency eye care facilities.

Keywords

Cataract surgery;, community discharge., review;, complications;

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities