Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This research presents a set of network databases based on real-world data, aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of network classification methods. The first database, called the "Social database," consists of networks from the Stanford Network Analysis Project (SNAP) platform, including two classes, namely, Google+ and Twitter, we have made some preprocessment and also reduced the original dataset from the SNAP platform such that each class contains 50 networks. The other databases presented in this study are collectively known as the "Metabolic database," as they are constructed using the substrate-product network model and are based on biochemical reactions of organisms obtained from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (KEGG). The networks were generated using a model that considers metabolites as vertices and chemical reactions as edges. The Metabolic database comprises six classification schemes, which include the "kingdom-database" with 160 network samples, where each of the four classes contains 40 networks representing animal, plant, fungi, and protist kingdoms. The remaining databases in the Metabolic database are the "Animal-database," "Fungi-database," "Plant-database," "Firmicutes-Bacilis-database," and "Actinobacteria-database," each containing a varying number of network samples. To ensure consistency and comparability of our results, we implemented a standardization procedure whereby all networks were converted to adjacency list format. This allowed us to more efficiently process and analyze the data.
Twitter Data
Twitter Data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts