Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

World Data System and Canadian CoreTrustSeal Cohort Members Needs Assessment - Reviewer Instrument and Supplemental Information

Authors: Lee, Caroline; Gonzalez, Sarah; Payne, Karen;

World Data System and Canadian CoreTrustSeal Cohort Members Needs Assessment - Reviewer Instrument and Supplemental Information

Abstract

From July 2022 to December 2022, the World Data System (WDS) International Technology (ITO) and International Program (IPO) Offices conducted a review of strategic plans and technical roadmaps of all current WDS members and the set of Canadian repositories that participated in the Digital Research Alliance of Canada's CoreTrustSeal Certification Support and Funding Pilot (Digital Research Alliance of Canada, 2022). The purpose of this review was to test out a new organizational assessment method designed to identify needs and challenges faced by the WDS and Canadian CoreTrustSeal (CTS) Cohort members. Additionally, incorporated into this assessment were criteria from the Global Biodata Coalition (GBC), which is an initiative created to support funders by identifying and prioritizing fundamental data resources. This report serves as a supplemental file to the primary assessment, tentatively titled “Research Analysis: A World Data System and Canadian CoreTrustSeal Cohort Needs Assessment,” which will be published at a later date. This report includes the reviewer instrument, a list of criteria used when reviewing strategic plans, technical roadmaps, and additional types of documentation by the WDS research team. Included are all 98 questions that comprised the reviewer instrument, including qualitative and quantitative questions designed to capture as much information as possible about the reviewed organization. Additionally, this report provides the Global Biodata Coalition (GBC) Indicators that were used in conjunction with additional prioritized criteria to create the reviewer instrument. Finally, incorporated into this report is a list of specific standards, policies, and practices mentioned and utilized by the reviewed WDS and Canadian CoreTrustSeal Cohort members. The primary intention behind this list is to demonstrate the varying standards and protocols used by the organizations included in this assessment. While also reflecting the type and variety of information the World Data System was able to glean from the review of strategic plans and technical roadmaps utilizing this organizational assessment method. World Data System International Program Office (WDS-IPO) is hosted by the University of Tennessee at the University of Tennessee Oak Ridge Innovation Institute. This work is supported by a cooperative agreement (DE-SC0021915) with the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science.

Keywords

needs assessment, CoreTrustSeal, World Data System, data repository

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 22
    download downloads 17
  • 22
    views
    17
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
22
17