{"references": ["E. T. Hall, A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior,American Anthropologist, 65(5), 1963, 1003-1026.", "B. Lawson, Sociofugal and sociopetal space, The Language of Space, 2001, 140-14", "H. Osmond, Function as the Basis of Psychiatric Ward Design, Mental Hospitals. American Psychiatric Association, 04(01), 1957, 23\u201329.", "R. Sommer,Sociofugal Space, American Journal of Sociology, 27 (6),1967, 654\u2013660.", "M. Bracco, Prossemica, Universo del Corpo (Istitutodell'Enciclopedia italiana,Treccani: Roma, 2000).", "E. M. Rogers, W. B. Hart and M. Yoshitaka Miike, Edward T. Hall and The History of Intercultural Communication: The United States and Japan. (Universit\u00e4t Keio, Japan: Institute for Media and Communication Research, 2002).", "T. M. Ciolek, The Proxemics Lexicon: a first approximation, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8 (1), 1983, 55\u201375", "D.A. Herrera, Gaze, turn-taking and proxemics in multiparty versus dyadic conversation across cultures. (The University of Texas: El Paso, 2010)."]}

This article aims to verify the possibility of delimiting a semiotic field, applied to physical activity and sports. In order to partially verify this hypothesis, the field of proxemics, one of the nuclear semiotic branches, has been proposed as a field of work. The results confirmed the initial hypothesis, allowing to verify the performance of all proxemic components within sport. In this way, progress is being made in the configuration of a semiotic model of sport which, in the future, will have to be developed in the same direction.