Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Forschungssoftware rezensieren - Konzeption, Durchführung und Umsetzung

Authors: Homburg, Timo; Klammt, Anne; Offert, Fabian; Thiery, Florian;

Forschungssoftware rezensieren - Konzeption, Durchführung und Umsetzung

Abstract

"Wissenschaftliche Rezensionen von Forschungssoftware schätzen deren Beitrag zur Lösung einer Aufgabe im Forschungsprozess, ihre Anwendbarkeit und Zielgruppe, sowie ihre handwerkliche Qualität und Nachhaltigkeit ein. Softwarerezensionen sind daher ein wesentlicher Bestandteil einer Wissenschaftspraxis, die ihre Methoden offenlegt und kritisch reflektiert. Bislang aber erscheinen noch wenige Rezensionen. Der Workshop soll Interessierten einen Einstieg bieten und somit zur Verbreitung und Anerkennung dieses wichtigen wissenschaftlichen Formats beitragen. Gemeinschaftlich mit den Teilnehmer_innen möchten wir am Beispiel kleiner, überschaubarer Tools alle Arbeitsschritte einer Rezension von Forschungssoftware am praktischen Beispiel durchführen. Im Mittelpunkt steht das Kennenlernen und Anwenden von Aspekten, mit denen eine Software besprochen werden kann. Rezensionen von Software fragen ganz unterschiedliche Kompetenzen ab und sind daher besonders gut und effizient als Team zu bearbeiten. Im Idealfall entsteht während des Workshops genug Material, um unterstützt von den Workshopanbieter_innen ohne umfangreiche Nacharbeiten eine Rezension zur Veröffentlichung einzureichen." Ein Beitrag zur 9. Tagung des Verbands "Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum" - DHd 2023 Open Humanities Open Culture.

Keywords

Open Schiences, Rezension, Digital Literacy, Bewertung, DHd2023, Research Software Engineering, Schreiben, Kollaboration, Software

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 10
  • 6
    views
    10
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
10
Green