{"references": ["ALB\u00c1N, A. & ROSERO, J. R. 2016. Colonialidad de la naturaleza:\u00bf imposici\u00f3n tecnol\u00f3gica y usurpaci\u00f3n epist\u00e9mica? Interculturalidad, desarrollo y re-existencia. N\u00f3madas (Col), 27-41.", "BERGERON, Y. & RIVET, M. 2019. La descolonizaci\u00f3n de la Museolog\u00eda: Museos, mestizajes y mitos de origen. la Mus\u00e9ologie Descolonizando la Museolog\u00eda, ICOFOM, 28 - 36.", "D\u00cdAZ-RODR\u00cdGUEZ, N. & PISONI, G. 2020. Accessible Cultural Heritage through Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Adjunct Publication of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Genoa, Italy: Association for Computing Machinery.", "HECKER, S., HAKLAY, M., BOWSER, A., MAKUCH, Z., VOGEL, J., BONN, A. & MOEDAS, C. 2018. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, UCL Press.", "KULLENBERG, C. & KASPEROWSKI, D. 2016. What is citizen science?\u2013A scientometric meta-analysis. PloS one, 11, e0147152.", "LESORT, T., LOMONACO, V., STOIAN, A., MALTONI, D., FILLIAT, D. & D\u00cdAZ-RODR\u00cdGUEZ, N. 2020. Continual learning for robotics: Definition, framework, learning strategies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 52-68.", "LOUIS, R. P., JOHNSON, J. T. & PRAMONO, A. H. 2012. Introduction: Indigenous cartographies and counter-mapping. University of Toronto Press Incorporated.", "MIGNOLO, W. D. & WALSH, C. E. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis, Duke University Press.", "MURRIETA-FLORES, P., FAVILA-V\u00c1ZQUEZ, M. & FLORES-MOR\u00c1N, A. 2021. Indigenous deep mapping: A conceptual and representational analysis of space in Mesoamerica and New Spain. Making Deep Maps. Routledge.", "PEARCE, M. W. & LOUIS, R. P. 2008. Mapping indigenous depth of place.", "PEARCE, T. D., FORD, J. D., LAIDLER, G. J., SMIT, B., DUERDEN, F., ALLARUT, M., ANDRACHUK, M., BARYLUK, S., DIALLA, A. & ELEE, P. 2009. Community collaboration and climate change research in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Research, 28, 10-27.", "PICKLES, J. 2012. A History of Spaces: cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded World, Routledge.", "REID, G. & SIEBER, R. 2020. Do geospatial ontologies perpetuate Indigenous assimilation? Progress in Human Geography, 44, 216-234."]}

As technology advances, so does our understanding of the world. Technology can act as that great disruptor which facilitates, (or hinders) access to cultural knowledge. Towards a National Collection (TaNC) is a 22m euro UK investment that aims to identify the pathways into such sustainable socio-technical infrastructures where all levels of knowledge and representation can be produced and used by diverse groups with different cultural needs of information, and therefore tools to make use of it. The Museo Integrado calls for museums to “take part in bringing awareness into the societies to which it serves”. However, this can become challenging due to the alienation generated by Western and Anglo-centric epistemologies, cosmovision and technologic impositions. How are museums meant to represent knowledge when the systems used to describe such knowledge do not engage with the perspective of the communities they are meant to serve? How do we overcome the large digital divide within cultural institutions, their staff, and especially among communities, not only in the context of the Global South, but also evident within the UK. The Digital Humanities have provided a paradigm shift in how knowledge production can sustain (and disrupt) novel research methods in the historic and cultural sector. TaNC research aims to identify such novel methods and integrate them within a sustainable model accessible for the wide range of users and non-direct users of cultural heritage.