Published as part of Dong1, Yang, Duan1, Shengchang, Xia, Qiuju, Liang, Zhenchang, Dong1, Xiao, Margaryan, Kristine, Musayev, Mirza, Goryslavets, Svitlana, Zduni, Goran, Bert, Pierre-François, Lacombe11, Thierry, Maul1, Erika, Nick, Peter, Bitskinashvili, Kakha, Bisztray, György Dénes, Drori, Elyashiv, Lorenzis, Gabriella De, Cunha, Jorge, Popescu, Carmen Florentina, Arroyo-Garcia, Rosa, Arnold, Claire, Ergül, Ali, Zhu1, Yifan, Ma, Chao, Wang, Shufen, Liu1, Siqi, Tang, Liu, Wang, Chunping, Li, Dawei & Pan, Yunbing, 2023, Dual domestications and origin of traits in grapevine evolution, pp. 892-901 in Science 379 on page 5, DOI: 10.1126/science.add8655, http://zenodo.org/record/7704939

Fig. 3. Dual domestications of V. vinifera in Western Asia and the Caucasus. (A) Pairwise fixation index of the major grapevine groups. (B) Outgroup f3 statistics biplot measuring genetic similarity. Rotund, Muscadinia rotundifolia. Stars mark the f3 statistics for CG1/CG2. (C) Estimated split times among Syl-E1/2 and CG1/2 with MSMC2 (left). Red bars indicate medians with 95% confidence intervals. (D) Geographic distribution of CG1 and CG2 in relation to the domestication centers. Human dispersal routes are shown. (E) Shared (sky blue) and unique domestication selective sweep regions (red and dark teal) in V. vinifera.