Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract High-content microscopy offers a scalable approach to screen against multiple targets in a single pass. Prior work has focused on methods to select “optimal” cellular readouts in microscopy screens. However, methods to select optimal cell line models have garnered much less attention. Here, we provide a roadmap for how to select the cell line or lines that are best suited to identify bioactive compounds and their mechanism of action (MOA). We test our approach on compounds targeting cancer-relevant pathways, ranking cell lines in two tasks: detecting compound activity (“phenoactivity”) and grouping compounds with similar MOA by similar phenotype (“phenosimilarity”). Evaluating six cell lines across 3214 well-annotated compounds, we show that optimal cell line selection depends on both the task of interest (e.g. detecting phenoactivity vs. inferring phenosimilarity) and distribution of MOAs within the compound library. Given a task of interest and set of compounds, we provide a systematic framework for choosing optimal cell line(s). Our framework can be used to reduce the number of cell lines required to identify hits within a compound library and help accelerate the pace of early drug discovery.
570, Organic Chemistry, Biological Sciences, Article, 004, Cell Line, Medicinal and Biomolecular Chemistry, Biological sciences, Phenotype, Chemical sciences, 5.1 Pharmaceuticals, Chemical Sciences, Drug Discovery, Cancer
570, Organic Chemistry, Biological Sciences, Article, 004, Cell Line, Medicinal and Biomolecular Chemistry, Biological sciences, Phenotype, Chemical sciences, 5.1 Pharmaceuticals, Chemical Sciences, Drug Discovery, Cancer
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 15 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts