Downloads provided by UsageCounts
At the Researcher to Reader Conference, which takes place in London at the end of February each year, Rick Anderson puts together a formal debate program, in which two teams of two people each face off to debate a proposition provided to them ahead of time. Each side makes an opening statement, and then each side responds, and then there is discussion with the audience. The audience is polled to determine its level of agreement with the proposition both before and after the debate itself, and whichever team moves the most votes in its direction is declared the winner. The proposition around which the debate took place in 2023 was: Resolved: Open practices make science better. The debate materials have been shared in the Zenodo entry: Introduction text Opening Speech from the team speaking in favor of the proposition Opening speech from the team speaking against the proposition Response from the team speaking in favor of the proposition Response from the team speaking against of the proposition Closing statement
debate, open science
debate, open science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 20 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts