Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

iHelp: Data Collection and Pilot Assessments I

Authors: Gabriel Danciu; Irina Nicolae; Florin Picioroaga; Artitaya Lophatananon; Te-Min Ke; Kenneth Muir; Eshita Dhar; +10 Authors

iHelp: Data Collection and Pilot Assessments I

Abstract

This document represents the assessment of the iHelp approaches by showing the proposed data collecting processing and modelling flow. This workflow’s final purpose is to provide to the clinicians a better insight of the Pancreatic Cancer disease. There are five pilot studies within the iHelp designed to help test and validate the personalized solution developed in this project by providing different types of data which is useful within the various aspects/scenarios of disease prevention. The five pilots involved in this project, provide the input data needed for the IHelp technical partners to analyse and compile smart models that can help with predicting this type of disease. Upon the completion of the 1st iteration of this report on D6.5 (“Data Collection and Pilot Assessments I”), adjustments and improvements will be made and will be reflected in the 2nd iteration of this deliverable, i.e., D6.6 (“Data Collection and Pilot Assessments II”). This document contains the description of data collection processes and procedures and the instruments used to evaluate these processes. It also describes the evaluation mechanisms of pilot studies. The data collection instruments section presents an overview of what the data collection strategy is for each pilot, how data will be formatted and distributed and what is the methodology for data ingestion into the iHelp platform from each pilot’s perspective. Pilots will present details about the measuring of the data quality by describing the evaluation instruments for data collection and assessment measures. Pilots will present details about the data quality and quantity and will describe how the data flow is managed. To ensure proper data flow and smooth ingestion of the data from the pilots to the iHelp platform, partners have identified potential risks that could appear, and the solutions that alleviate the impact of these potential issues.

Keywords

Pilot Assessments, Data Collection, pancreatic cancer, iHelp, Data Collection and Pilot Assessments

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
    download downloads 14
  • 8
    views
    14
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
14
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research