Downloads provided by UsageCounts
As the world shut down in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020, many radiation oncologists began collaborating to revive a decades-old use of ionizing radiation therapy on a clinical trial to try to help with COVID-19 pneumonia. Using low dose radiation therapy (LDRT) for a non-malignant disease based upon historical data has been highly controversial, but this debate has helped revive questions about the role of radiation therapy in medicine in ways that deserve deeper consideration. The aim of this paper is to provide some historical and scientific perspective on perceptions of radiation therapy and its risks, including questioning the linear no threshold (LNT) hypothesis and the emergence of data on radiation hormesis. The hope is that this review may stimulate debate on whether to expand the use of low dose radiotherapy (LDRT) beyond its current use primarily for neoplastic disease. Areas of interest include the potential use of LDRT for neurodegenerative, neuroinflammatory, autoimmune disease and for acute injury.
non-malignant disease, radiation medicine, hormesis, radiation oncology, linear no threshold, low dose radiation therapy
non-malignant disease, radiation medicine, hormesis, radiation oncology, linear no threshold, low dose radiation therapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 45 | |
| downloads | 16 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts