Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

EURO-CORDEX GCM Selection & Ensemble Design: Implementation Framework

Authors: Sobolowski, Stefan; Somot, Samuel; Fernandez, Jesus; Evin, Guillaume; Maraun, Douglas; Kotlarski, Sven; Jury, Martin; +21 Authors

EURO-CORDEX GCM Selection & Ensemble Design: Implementation Framework

Abstract

This white paper and the accompanying tables published in GitHub are meant to help modellers in EURO-CORDEX, and elsewhere, make informed decisions when it comes to selecting GCMs for downscaling from the CMIP6 archive. While the approach to GCM selection during the CMIP5 downscaling phase cannot be wholly considered an “ensemble of opportunity” it is also true that the selection of GCMs was not as rigorous as it could have been. We aim to improve upon this situation and help us construct smarter, more reliable and more useful downscaled ensembles (dynamical, statistical and hybrid) and make the selection process more transparent. The community should consider this a living document that will evolve along with our scientific understanding. We rely mostly on peer-reviewed literature for the assessment of CMIP6 models provided in the linked tables and have devised innovative ways to include relevant metadata and update the tool with new results [https://wcrp-cordex.github.io/cmip6-for-cordex]. We encourage the wider CORDEX community to become active in this activity, suggest ways to improve and alert us when new results become available or mistakes are noted in the evaluation tables. We also hope that this EURO-CORDEX GCM selection work can inspire good practices and contribute to fruitful discussions in other CORDEX domains and CORDEX-FPS activities.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 619
    download downloads 593
  • 619
    views
    593
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
619
593
Green
Related to Research communities