Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Barney, J., Wright, M., &Ketchen, Jr., D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625-641. doi:10.1177/014920630102700601", "Rothwell, W. (2015). Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within. New York: AMACOM.", "Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page Publishers", "] Nel, P., & Du Plessis, A. (2013). Workforce cost effects on productivity, quality and satisfaction in organisations. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 13, 165-181. Retrieved from http://www. http://jppc.ro", "Stahl, G., Bj\u00f6rkman, I., Farndale, E., Morris, S. S., Paauwe, J., Stiles, P., Trevor, J., & Wright, P. (2012). Six principles of effective global talent management. Sloan Management Review, 53, 25-42. Retrieved from http://www.sloanreview.mit.edu"]}
This paper presents a proposed conceptual model for creating and implementing an organizational succession plan based on the resource-based view of the firm (RBV) theory. The proposed model should provide organizational and human resources leaders, as well as organizational development (OD) practitioners with the ability to develop the organization’s internal leadership pool as a driver of competitive advantage. This proposed conceptual model bridges a gap in literature related to talent management frameworks, as well as defining a succession plan for an organization and the subsequent link to organizational performance
talent leadership, RBV, HR metrics,, talent management,, succession planning,
talent leadership, RBV, HR metrics,, talent management,, succession planning,
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts