Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This is a report on a project that tested the Research Data Management Framework for Institutions, developed by the ARDC and 25 Australian universities under the Institutional Underpinnings Program. The Griffith University project involved a university-wide review that identified the culture of research data management, specifically looking at values, aims and experiences. About the Institutional Underpinnings Program In partnership with 25 Australian universities, we created a jointly-agreed Research Data Management Framework for Institutions to manage, share, retain and dispose of research data. Each partner university conducted projects to validate and test an aspect of the framework in their local contexts. This is a report on one of the projects. More information View more outputs of the Institutional Underpinnings program View the Research Data Management Framework for Institutions 10.5281/zenodo.6392340
culture change, research culture change, research data management, research culture
culture change, research culture change, research data management, research culture
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 | |
| downloads | 25 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts