Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Platygaster lobata Buhl 2014, sp. n.

Authors: Buhl, Peter Neerup;

Platygaster lobata Buhl 2014, sp. n.

Abstract

Platygaster lobata sp. n. Figs 51–54 Etymology: Derived from Latin lobus (lobe); in reference to the characteristic long mid lobe of mesoscutum. Diagnosis: Female A9 1.15× as long as wide; notauli absent; mid lobe of mesoscutum extended over anterior 0.4 of scutellum; propodeal carinae strongly diverging; female metasoma slightly longer than rest of body. Description: Female. Body length 0.9 mm. Dark reddish brown with blackish head, A1–A5, mandibles and legs rather uniformly yellowish brown, last segment of all tarsi slightly darkened; A6–A10 dark reddish brown. Head from above (Fig. 51) 2.2× as wide as long, 1.25× as wide as mesosoma, rather dull due to very fine reticulate microsculpture; occiput also with weak, semi-circular transverse striation over most of width; vertex and frons without other sculpture (vertex with a few transverse elements postero-medially); occiput margined anteriorly but without a distinct carina. OOL=LOL. Head in frontal view 1.25× as wide as high. Antenna (Fig. 52) with A1 0.85× as long as height of head, longer than distance between (measured at midlength of frons) inner orbits (about 12:11); A9 about 1.15× as long as wide. Mesosoma 1.4× as long as wide, 1.05× as high as wide. Sides of pronotum smooth, with sparse setation over most of surface. Mesoscutum bare along middle, the rest with sparse and slightly unevenly distributed setae; disc with very fine microsculpture, almost smooth all over; notauli absent; hind margin with a wide prolongation medially, covering anterior 0.4 of scutellum, at each side with about seven long setae over scuto-scutellar grooves. Mesopleuron smooth. Scutellum (Fig. 53) with only a few setae, at level of mesoscutum, evenly sloping down from end of mesoscutal prolongation. Metapleuron with pilosity all over. Propodeal carinae short, markedly diverging; area between them smooth, as long as the width between carinae at their anterior end. Fore wing hardly surpassing tip of metasoma, 0.7× as long as entire body, 2.5× as long as wide, almost clear, with fine and dense microtrichia; length of marginal cilia 0.08× width of wing. Hind wing 5.7× as long as wide, with two hamuli; marginal cilia nearly 0.4× width of wing. Metasoma (Fig. 54) slightly longer than head and mesosoma combined (28:27), 0.9× as wide as mesosoma. T1 with weak longitudinal crenulation and three slightly more prominent longitudinal carinae. T2 with weak longitudinal striation in basal foveae to 0.4× length of tergite, between basal foveae are four longitudinal carinae reaching hardly 0.2 length of tergite. T3–T6 almost smooth, each with a transverse row of setae inserted in shallow punctures: six on each of T3–T4, eight on each of T5–T6. Comparison: This species is somewhat similar to P. sonnei Buhl, 2011, and P. tricarinata sp. n., because of the prolonged mid lobe of mesoscutum. It runs to P. sonnei in Buhl’s (2011 b) key, but that species has A5 distinctly shorter and narrower than A4 (in P. lobata, A5 is fully as long and as wide as A4), A9 as wide as long, propodeal carinae parallel, less elongate wings with sparse microtrichia, and metasoma only 0.9× as long as rest of body, as wide as mesosoma, with slightly longer striation on base of T2. P. tricarinata has A9 as wide as long, longer notauli, shorter prolongation over base of scutellum, and parallel propodeal carinae. Cf. also description of P. tricarinata below. Holotype: ♀ TOGO: Région des Plateaux, Akloa, at creek Domi coming from the Cascades d’Akloa (07°30'46"N 00°36'36"E), 22.iv. 2008, 280 m, cocoa and avocado plantation, swept, M. von Tschirnhaus.

Published as part of Buhl, Peter Neerup, 2014, New species and new records of Platygastrinae and Sceliotrachelinae from Togo (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae), pp. 68 in African Invertebrates 55 (1) on pages 96-97, DOI: 10.5733/afin.055.0106, http://zenodo.org/record/7649696

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Platygastridae, Animalia, Platygaster lobata, Biodiversity, Platygaster, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average