Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Advanced Research
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND AND THE ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS : A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN WESTERN MAHARASHTRA

Authors: Ninad Chitnavis; Dhananjay Jagtap; Akshaya Parthiban; Ali Reza Shojai;

COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND AND THE ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS : A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN WESTERN MAHARASHTRA

Abstract

Background :Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 1 in 7. The Alvarado scoring system and ultrasonography play a definite role in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, because of the easy availability, cost effectiveness and being radiation free. According to the analysis, the percentage of Appendicectomies done for a normal appendix mistaken to be Acute Appendicitis was found to be as high as 20%.The following study compares the accuracy of the Alvorado scoring system and Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Acute appendicitis and examines the value of using both modalities together. Materials and Methods :In this study 100 patients were included with provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis and admitted and operated in the Department of General Surgery, MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai between January 2021 to November 2022. Alvarado score was applied and ultra sound abdomen was done pre operatively. The decision for surgery was made independent of the score and ultra sound finding. Diagnosis of patients who underwent appendicectomy was confirmed by histopathology report. Results :In the present study, 100 cases were provisionally diagnosed of having acute appendicitis and were operated during the study period.Itwas seen that 95.52% of patients who were thought to be positive by Alvarado score >=7 usually had appendicitis by histopathology where as 4.08% of the patients were normal by histopathological examination. This accounted for 47.96% and 33.33% of the total patients respectively. From this the sensitivity of the Alvarado score is calculated to be 47.96%. Ultrasound alone showed a PPV of 67% and a NPV of 66.7%. Conclusion :In our study, Alvarado score had better sensitivity than ultrasonography. Alvarado score has a high diagnostic value (97.7%). USG has role in ruling out normal appendix and other pathology, with a specificity of 66.67% When we diagnose acute appendicitis based on the individual results of Alvarado score and USG, we get a statistically significant value. Hence as a conclusion of this study, alvaradoscore and USG together could be applied in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis for better outcomes and decision making.

Keywords

Appendicitis Alvarado score Ultrasonography Mantrels Appendicectomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 8
  • 4
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
8
Green
gold