Views provided by UsageCounts
The traditional framework of federated learning requires each client to re-train their models in every iteration, making it infeasible for resource-constrained mobile devices to train deep-learning (DL) models. Split learning (SL) provides an alternative by using a centralized server to offload the computation of activation and back-propagation for a subset of the model but suffers from problems of slow convergence and lower accuracy. In this paper, we implement PFSL, a new framework of distributed split learning where a large number of thin clients perform transfer learning in parallel, starting with a pre-trained DL model without sharing their data or labels with a central server. We implement a lightweight step of personalization of client models to provide high performance for their respective data distributions. Furthermore, we evaluate performance fairness amongst clients under a work fairness constraint for various scenarios of non-i.i.d. data distributions and unequal sample sizes. Our accuracy far exceeds that of current SL algorithms and is very close to that of centralized learning on several real-life benchmarks. It has a very low computation cost and promises to deliver the full benefits of DL to extremely thin, resource-constrained clients.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts