
Temperate streams are subsidized by inputs of leaf litter peaking in fall. Yet, stream communities decompose dead leaves and integrate their energy in the aquatic food web throughout the whole year. Most studies investigating stream decomposition largely overlook long-term trajectories, which must be understood for an appropriate temporal upscaling of ecosystem processes. Using mesocosms, we quantified changes in carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content of three leaf species during decomposition at weekly to multi-month intervals for up to a year; then, we tested how decomposition duration affected the subsequent consumption by a keystone amphipod macroinvertebrate. Over a year, nitrogen and phosphorus percentage increased across all leaf species, but only the recalcitrant species maintained initial levels of absolute nitrogen and phosphorus. Prolonged decomposition barely affected or impaired amphipod consumption of labile leaf species, whereas it enhanced feeding on the recalcitrant species. Overall, we demonstrate that recalcitrant leaves might serve as longer-stored potential resources for when labile species have already been consumed, and that their increasing palatability observed over multi-month intervals of sustained decomposition may stabilize fluctuations in the rates of leaf litter integration into aquatic food webs. This year-long perspective highlights the relevancy of slow-decomposing leaves for aquatic detrital communities.
Funding is from the Swiss Federal Office for Environment (FOEN/BAFU), the University of Zurich Research Priority Programme Global Change and Biodiversity, and the Swiss National Science Foundation.
ecological stoichiometry, carbon flows, fragmentation, temporal dynamics, detritus, Gammarus fossarum, nutrient cycling, microbial decomposition, freshwater, shredders
ecological stoichiometry, carbon flows, fragmentation, temporal dynamics, detritus, Gammarus fossarum, nutrient cycling, microbial decomposition, freshwater, shredders
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
