
handle: 10344/13137
A key limitation of finite element analysis is accurate modelling of material damage. While additional material models exist that improve correlations between simulated damage and experimental data, these models often require additional parameters that are difficult to estimate. In this work we show that Bayesian optimisation, a machine learning technique, can be used to identify material model parameters. We show that Bayesian derived material model parameters result in simulated output with less than 2 % error compared to experimental data. The framework detailed here is fully autonomous, requiring only basic information that can be derived from a simple tensile test. We have successfully applied this framework to three datasets of P91 material tested at ambient (20 ◦C) and higher (500 ◦C) temperatures.
non-unique solution, Engineering, machine learning, Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics, Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, Anelastic fracture and damage, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, parameter selection, second test geometry, Bayesian optimisation, bayesian optimisation, ductile damage
non-unique solution, Engineering, machine learning, Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics, Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, Anelastic fracture and damage, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, parameter selection, second test geometry, Bayesian optimisation, bayesian optimisation, ductile damage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
