{"references": ["Ageev, M., Guo, Q., Lagun, D., & Agichtein, E. (2011). Find it if you can: A game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. In Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 345\u2013354). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2009916.2009965. Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implications. Worth Publishers.", "Bjorklund, \u00a8 L. (2013). Why do they not see what I see? In H.E. Middleton, & L.K.J. Baartman (Eds.), Transfer, transitions and transformations of learning (pp. 149\u2013167). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-437-6. Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. Allen (Eds.), International handbook of internet research (pp. 97\u2013117). Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8."]}

Searches with learning intent typically require the users to interact with the searching environment and perform knowledge acquisition features such as scan, read, and process the online content to fulfill their information needs. To capture indicators from searching behaviors that could account for the knowledge gained during a Web search, a qualitative study was performed using the Concurrent Think-Aloud protocol to observe the mechanisms of transfer and map knowledge flows during 78 search sessions. Findings indicate evidence of transfer of learning in the form of sixteen online information searching strategy indicators. This research aids the understanding of how knowledge is gained during search sessions and how to identify behaviors that could indicate that learning has occurred, which could be used to represent knowledge gain on Web search engines. In this way, it can aid search engines to become not only better tools of searching, but also tools of learning.