Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CAPABLE D3.4: Computer-Interpretable Guidelines

Authors: Quaglini, Silvana; Panzarasa, Silvia; Sacchi, Lucia; Leizer, Roy; Cornet, Ronald; Glaser, Savannah;

CAPABLE D3.4: Computer-Interpretable Guidelines

Abstract

In this deliverable, we describe the knowledge engineering process used to formalize the clinical practice guidelines implemented in CAPABLE. More precisely the following steps will be illustrated: Choice of the guidelines - selecting the most compatible guidelines for the system. Text processing mechanism - detecting recommendations and translating them into a set of computer-interpretable rules. Analysis of each recommendation - detecting what raw data type was involved, which vocabulary is mostly suitable for coding, and what abstractions need to be performed on this raw data. This allows for achieving clearer representation, at the same time producing reusable pieces of knowledge. The detected raw data also represents the minimum data set needed by the CAPABLE DSS (Decision Support System), so this step has been fundamental for the development of other CAPABLE components. Translation of each recommendation into a set of computer-interpretable rules, organization of rules into a logical flow, and their representation using the Composer tool, i.e., the authoring tool developed by one of the project partners. In this step, adaptations have been implemented to allow smooth guideline implementation in different healthcare settings. Validation of the represented knowledge by simulating realistic clinical scenarios (oncologists have been involved in this phase). Particular attention has been put to multimorbidity management, since running guidelines for different pathologies may lead to contradictory recommendations, which must be resolved Handover to the implementation team and refinement iterations with the team itself. The deliverable will then provide the actual description of the formalized guidelines, through a set of flowcharts, and links to their representation in Composer.

This deliverable is a part of a project receiving funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 875052

Keywords

computer-interpretable guidelines, guideline modeling, clinical practice guidelines

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 21
    download downloads 18
  • 21
    views
    18
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
21
18
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities