Views provided by UsageCounts
Monti CB, Secchi F, Alì M, Carbone FS, Bonomo L, Capra D, Mobini N, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F. Quantitative Assessment of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Edema at Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Low-Risk Myocarditis Patients. Tomography. 2022 Apr 1;8(2):974-984. doi: 10.3390/tomography8020078. PMID: 35448712; PMCID: PMC9028348. Abstract In this study, we aimed to quantify LGE and edema at short-tau inversion recovery sequences on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with myocarditis. We retrospectively evaluated CMR examinations performed during the acute phase and at follow-up. Forty-seven patients were eligible for retrospective LGE assessment, and, among them, twenty-five patients were eligible for edema evaluation. Both groups were paired with age- and sex-matched controls. The median left ventricle LGE was 6.4% (interquartile range 5.0-9.2%) at the acute phase, 4.4% (3.3-7.2%) at follow-up, and 4.3% (3.0-5.3%) in controls, the acute phase being higher than both follow-up and controls (p < 0.001 for both), while follow-up and controls did not differ (p = 0.139). An optimal threshold of 5.0% was obtained for LGE with 87% sensitivity and 48% specificity; the positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 1.67, and the negative LR was 0.27. Edema was 12.8% (9.4-18.1%) at the acute phase, 7.3% (5.5-8.8%) at follow-up, and 6.7% (5.6-8.6%) in controls, the acute phase being higher than both follow-up and controls (both p < 0.001), while follow-up and controls did not differ (p = 0.900). An optimal threshold of 9.5% was obtained for edema with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 88%; the positive LR was 6.33, and the negative LR was 0.27. LGE and edema thresholds are useful in cases of suspected mild myocarditis.
magnetic resonance imaging, gadolinium, myocarditis, edema
magnetic resonance imaging, gadolinium, myocarditis, edema
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts