Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lab Study Dataset: FIDO2 Platform and Roaming Authentication on Smartphones

Authors: Würsching, Leon; Putz, Florentin; Haesler, Steffen; Hollick, Matthias;

Lab Study Dataset: FIDO2 Platform and Roaming Authentication on Smartphones

Abstract

This record contains the lab study dataset and evaluation R source code from the paper "FIDO2 the Rescue? Platform vs. Roaming Authentication on Smartphones" by Leon Würsching*, Florentin Putz* (* = equal contribution), Steffen Haesler, and Matthias Hollick in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Our pseudonymous dataset contains 22 variables for each of our 87 participants in our between-groups lab study. The variables consist of usability and acceptance scores, the adoption likelihood for 11 account types, and 9 control variables including the level of privacy concerns and ATI. Our R Markdown source code includes the full reproducible code of our study. This code generates all statistical figures from our paper. The code can also be used to reproduce our quantitative results and tables. Please refer to the README.md file and our paper for further details about the dataset and the lab study. This work has been co-funded by the LOEWE initiative (Hesse, Germany) within the emergenCITY center and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany in the project Open6GHub (grant number: 16KISK014).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Empirical Study, Lab Study, HCI, Biometric, User Authentication, Privacy, Usability, Security, Passwordless, Usable Security

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 76
    download downloads 4
  • 76
    views
    4
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
76
4