Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of nalbuphine 10 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine versusbutorphanol 2 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine by epidural route for providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries

Authors: Dr.R.SREELEKHA; Dr. T. SWATHI PRIYADARSHINI;

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of nalbuphine 10 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine versusbutorphanol 2 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine by epidural route for providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries

Abstract

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of nalbuphine 10 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine versusbutorphanol 2 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine by epidural route for providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries. Methodology: The patients were randomly allocated into two groupsGROUP BB: received 2 ml of butorphanolwith 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, diluted in normal saline to 10 ml. Butorphanol 2 mg + 0.125% bupivacaine GROUP BN (control group): received 1 ml of nalbuphine with 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, diluted in normal saline to 10 ml. Nalbuphine 10 mg + 0.125% bupivacaine. In the postoperative period, when the patients complained of pain, the intensity of pain was assessed using the VAS scaleThe pain intensity was assessed by VAS score at 0, 15, 30, 60 minutes, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours after epidural injection ,onset of analgesia, duration of analgesia, Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 60 minutes, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours after epidural injection. SpO2 monitored continuously. Results: The mean time of onset of analgesia in group BN was 8.57±1.25 minutes, and the meantime of onset of analgesia in group BB was 6.90±0.99 minutes.The mean duration of analgesia was 5.06±0.75 hours in group BN, and the mean duration of analgesia was 7.07±1.66 hours in group BB. Conclusion: Butorphanol 2 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine provided faster onset of analgesia and longer duration of analgesia than with nalbuphine 10 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 9
  • 4
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
9
Green