{"references": ["Chestov, L\u00e9on (1926). \u00abMemento Mori (A propos de la th\u00e9orie de la connaissance d'Edmond Husserl)\u00bb. Revue philosophique de la France et de l'\u00c9tranger 101, n.o 1: pp. 5\u201362.", "Chestov, L\u00e9on (1927). \u00abQu'est\u2013ce que la v\u00e9rit\u00e9\u202f? (Ontologie et \u00c9thique)\u00bb. Revue philosophique de la France et de l'\u00c9tranger 103, n.o 1\u20132: pp. 36\u201374.", "Conrad\u2013Martius, Hedwig (1916). \u00abZur Ontologie und Erscheinungslehre der realen Aussenwelt\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 3: pp. 345\u2013542.", "Conrad\u2013Martius, Hedwig (1923). \u00abRealontologie\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 6: 159\u2013333.", "Delbos, Victor (1911). \u00abHusserl. Sa critique du psychologisme et sa conception d'une Logique pure\u00bb. Revue de M\u00e9taphysique et de Morale 19: pp. 685\u201398.", "H\u00e9ring, Jean (1926). Ph\u00e9nom\u00e9nologie et philosophie religieuse. Paris: Alcan.", "H\u00e9ring, Jean (1926). \u00abRecension de J. H\u00e9ring, Ph\u00e9nom\u00e9nologie et philosophie religieuse\u00bb. Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses 6: pp. 73\u201379.", "H\u00e9ring, Jean (1927). \u00abSub specie aeterni. R\u00e9ponse \u00e0 une critique de la philosophie de Husserl\u00bb. Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses: pp. 351\u201364.", "Husserl, Edmund (1900). Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Theil: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Halle: Max Niemeyer", "Husserl, Edmund (1911). \u00abPhilosophie als strenge Wissenschaft\u00bb. Logos: Internationale Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie der Kultur 1: pp. 289\u2013341.", "Husserl, Edmund (1913). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Theil: Untersuchungen zur Ph\u00e4nomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. 2.a ed. Halle: Max Niemeyer.", "Husserl, Edmund (1913). \u00abVorwort\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 1, n.o 1: V\u2013VI.", "Husserl, Edmund (1913). \u00abIdeen zu einer reinen Ph\u00e4nomenologie und ph\u00e4nomenologischen Philosophie\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 1, n.o 1: pp. 1\u2013323.", "Schapp, Wilhelm (1910). Beitr\u00e4ge zur Ph\u00e4nomenologie der Wahrnehmung. G\u00f6ttingen: Kaestner.", "Scheler, Max Ferdinand (1913). \u00abDer Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 1, n.o 2: pp. 405\u2013565.", "Scheler, Max Ferdinand (1916). \u00abDer Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 2: pp. 21\u2013478.", "Scheler, Max Ferdinand (1916). \u00abDie Idee der sittlichen Handlung\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 3: pp. 126\u2013251.", "Scheler, Max Ferdinand (1921). \u00abVom Wesen der Philosophie und der moralischen Bedingung des philosophischen Erkennens\u00bb. En Vom Ewigen im Menschen I, pp. 59\u2013123. Leipzig: Der Neue Geist.", "Scheler, Max Ferdinand (1922). \u00abSittlichkeit und ethische Werturteile\u00bb. Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Philosophie und ph\u00e4nomenologische Forschung 5: pp. 462\u2013602."]}

The Strasbourg philosopher and theologian Jean Héring, a member of the Circle of Göttingen and a staunch defender of Husserl's phenomenological method, initiated a debate with the Russian philosopher Léon Chestov in response to a critical paper against Husserl and the entire phenomenological school. The accusation of rationalism and the affirmation of the impossibility of a phenomenology of religion incite the response of Héring, who some years before had published his Phenomenology and religious philosophy (1926) as an attempt to apply the intuition of essences to the domain of religious experience. Héring's paper is made up of two parts: 1) a critical exposition of Chestov's arguments and 2) a detailed examination of the exposed points. The purpose of the text is, on the one hand, to defend the scientific nature of Phenomenology and, on the other, to show its openness to the richness of reality that is accessed through the intuition of essences.