Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

PERIOPERATIVE GLYCEMIC MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC PATIENTS

Authors: Africano, Niko; De La Merced, Ryan; Leor, Gustavo;

PERIOPERATIVE GLYCEMIC MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC PATIENTS

Abstract

Uncontrolled perioperative glucose levels have been demonstrated to affect outcomes of Type 2 diabetics and non-diabetics undergoing surgical procedures to a lack of standardized protocols to manage hyperglycemic events, patients are at increased risk of infection, hospital lengths of stay, morbidity, and mortality (Cho et al., 2018; Duggan & Chen, 2019; Joslin Diabetes Center, 2019; Nair, Horibe, et al., 2016; Vogt & Bally, 2020). Appropriate perioperative blood glucose management is critical to enhancing health outcomes, shortening hospital length of stay, and reducing the need for hospital readmission (ADA, 2020). METHODS: Retrospective chart audits were conducted as part of a quality improvement project. Proper adherence to a glycemic management protocol was compared before and after education was provided to anesthesia providers. Data were obtained from the electronic health records of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent general anesthesia at a regional medical center hospital in Southern California. A total of 100 preintervention and 100 postintervention charts were included in the data collection sample. INTERVENTION: Optimal control of perioperative blood glucose levels is facilitated by a detailed, evidence-based protocol that clinicians can efficiently comprehend and employ. The Emory University School of Medicine Perioperative Insulin Management Protocol was used to educate anesthesia providers at a Southern California medical center. Retrospective chart audits were done to assess provider patterns of diabetic care and patient glycemic outcomes before protocol education and post-education. The efficacy of educational outcomes can be evaluated by performing chart reviews and identifying deviations from recommended protocols and suboptimal glycemic outcomes. RESULTS: Intraoperative blood glucose checks had a statistically significant gain from 14% to 39% (p = <0.001). Other process measures, such as frequency of insulin administration, and outcome measures, such as patient blood glucose control, were without significant change. These results indicated a continued deficiency in proper intraoperative glucose monitoring and insulin administration. CONCLUSION: Despite improved assessment of blood glucose, it is recommended that further inquiry to identify barriers that hinder compliance with the proposed protocol among anesthesia providers and initiation of targeted interventions to optimize perioperative glucose management in patients be initiated.

Keywords

blood glucose management, barriers, hyperglycemia, anesthesia, preoperative, perioperative guidelines, compliance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 116
    download downloads 55
  • 116
    views
    55
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
116
55
Green