DTADD Systematic Review Protocol (amended)

{"references": ["Page, M.J., et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021. 372: p. n71.", "Page, M.J., et al., PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021. 372: p. n160.", "Rethlefsen, M.L., et al., PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, 2021. 10(1): p. 39."]}

This document presents the protocol adopted to perform a systematic review for the DTADD project following the checklist provided by PRISMA and guidelines of the PRISMA-P Explanation and Elaboration.

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101066739.

Related Organizations

Oslo Metropolitan University
Norway
Delft University of Technology
Netherlands
Qatar University
Qatar

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Finite Element Method, Bridge Health Monitoring, Systematic Review, Bridge Information Modelling, Bridges, Digital Twins, Cultural Heritage Conservation

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average