Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms (EMOAs) typically assume that all objectives that are relevant to the decision-Maker (DM) are optimized by the EMOA. In some scenarios, however, there are irrelevant objectives that are optimized by the EMOA but ignored by the DM and hidden objectives that the DM considers when judging the utility of solutions but are not optimized. This discrepancy between the EMOA and the DM’s preferences may impede the search for the most-preferred solution and waste resources evaluating irrelevant objectives. Research on objective reduction has focused so far on the structure of the problem and correlations between objectives and neglected the role of the DM. We formally define the concepts of irrelevant and hidden objectives and proposed methods for detecting them, based on uni-variate feature selection and recursive feature elimination, that use the preferences already elicited when a DM interacts with a ranking-based interactive EMOA (iEMOA). We incorporate the detection methods into an iEMOA capable of dynamically switching the objectives being optimized. Our experiments show that this approach can efficiently identify which objectives are relevant to the DM and reduce the number of objectives being optimized while keeping and often improving the utility, according to the DM, of the best solution found. You can find the implementations used in the study for running the experiments in this repository.
Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization, Hidden Objectives, Irrelevant Objectives, Machine Learning, Dimension Reduction, Feature Selection
Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization, Hidden Objectives, Irrelevant Objectives, Machine Learning, Dimension Reduction, Feature Selection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts