Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Grania unitheca Prantoni & Wit & Erséus 2016, SP. NOV.

Authors: Prantoni, Alessandro Lívio; Wit, Pierre De; Erséus, Christer;

Grania unitheca Prantoni & Wit & Erséus 2016, SP. NOV.

Abstract

GRANIA UNITHECA SP. NOV. FIGURE 9 Holotype USNM1283175, CE11659, whole-mounted, sexually mature specimen, eight posterior segments amputat- ed, from North Carolina, USA, 34°47′22″N, 76°13′43″W. Sublitoral, 17 m in depth, sand. Collected by C. Erséus, 24 May 2011. COI barcode sequence, GenBank acc. no. KT428113; for other sequences, see Table 1. Etymology Named unitheca for its single spermatheca. Description Body> 8.56 mm long, 61 segments (including segments used for DNA analysis), 0.09 mm wide at segment V, 0.09 mm at segment XII. Prostomium rounded, 40 μm long, 60 μm wide, epidermis not reduced at front tip, 6 μm thick. Ventral chaetae from segment XV, lateral chaetae absent. Chaetae (Fig. 9A) 50–62 μm long, shaft straight, 3.7–5.0 μm thick at midpoint, hook-shaped. Epidermal gland cells inconspicuous. Clitellum not well developed. Spermathecal pore unpaired, mid dorsal, just posterior to 4/5. Male pores ventrolateral in middle of segment XII. Female pores not observed. Brain posteriorly indented. Head organ (sensu Rota & Erséus, 1996) absent. Pharyngeal glands in segments IV–VI, dorsal lobes in segment IV (one pair), in segment V (one pair), and in segment VI (one pair), ventral lobes present in segment IV (one pair), in segment V (two pairs), and in segment VI (two pairs); glands not connected dorsally. Nephridia not observed. Chloragogen cells not observed. Dorsal blood vessel commencing in segment XV. Coelomocytes not observed. Sperm sac extending to segment XIV, egg sac in segment XVII. Sperm funnels as long as wide (Fig. 9D). Vasa deferentia observed in segments XII– XIII, internally ciliated, coiled, 8 μm wide. Penial apparatus type 1 (sensu Coates, 1984), small, compact glandular bulb, 44 μm long, 39 μm wide; stylet absent (Fig. 9C). Midventral copulatory gland (in segment XIV) present. Spermatheca attached to oesophagus near 5/6. Ampulla nearly spherical, 52 μm long, 54 μm wide. Sperm rings maximally 9 μm wide (Fig. 9B). Ectal duct, 61 μm long, 35 μm wide at midcourse. No gland at spermathecal pore. Remarks An unpaired spermatheca is unusual in enchytraeids and, among Grania species, it has been only report- ed for Grania monospermatheca Erséus & Lasserre, 1976, also known from the continental shelf off the eastern USA. In fact, G. unitheca sp. nov. is morphologically similar to G. monospermatheca in almost all characters observed; however, it may be distinguished from G. monospermatheca by its small and compact penial bulb, with no stylet. Grania monospermatheca has a more complex penial apparatus, with a large glandular structure attached to the penial bulb, and the presence of a stylet. Furthermore, G. unitheca sp. nov. possesses a midventral copulatory gland in segment XIV. This gland was not observed in G. monospermatheca (see Erséus & Lasserre, 1976 and Coates & Erséus, 1985). Genetically, these two species are well distinguished from each other; however, the phylogenetic analysis, as well as the fact that the two species are from the same geographical area, suggest that G. unitheca sp. nov. and G. monospermatheca are closely related (see ‘Phylogenetic analysis’ below).

Published as part of Prantoni, Alessandro Lívio, Wit, Pierre De & Erséus, Christer, 2016, First reports of Grania (Clitellata: Enchytraeidae) from Africa and South America: molecular phylogeny and descriptions of nine new species, pp. 485-510 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 176 (3) on pages 500-501, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12333, http://zenodo.org/record/4720622

Keywords

Annelida, Animalia, Clitellata, Grania unitheca, Biodiversity, Enchytraeidae, Grania, Enchytraeida, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Top 10%
Average
1
Related to Research communities