Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Amiota latilabrum Jones & Grimaldi 2022, sp. nov.

Authors: Jones, Lance E.; Grimaldi, David A.;

Amiota latilabrum Jones & Grimaldi 2022, sp. nov.

Abstract

Amiota latilabrum, sp. nov. Figures 51C–D, 53B, 55, 60A, 91B DIAGNOSIS: Large fly (ThL 1.75–1.84 mm), dark brown and glossy; outer paraphysis heavily sclerotized, apex with hook, in lateral view with 2 long spines on posterodorsal margin, proximal spine longer, usually curving inward medially, nearly touching opposing appendage; base forming a tapered wing, curving medially in ventral; very similar to Amiota subnebojsa, but differs as follows: cercus smaller; surstylus less crescentic, apical lobe slightly longer (vs. shorter) than prensisetae; aedeagal apodeme shorter relative to its width; subepandrial sclerite appendage shape less cordate; basal paraphysis spine without small apical notch; ejaculatory apodeme slightly longer (vs. shorter) than depth of epandrium. DESCRIPTION: Large fly (ThL 1.75–1.84 mm), dark brown, uniformly so, glossy; legs yellow. Facial marking large, semicircular. Cheek wide (EL/CW 8.50–11.57), milky white posteriorly. Palp dark brown. Tergites 1 and 2 lightly colored. Arista: Short, plumose; longest branch D3; A.R. 0.28; graded series 7–8 dorsal branches shortening distad, 1 short ventral branch; none pointed mediad/laterad; arista trunk with medium-length microtrichia along entire length. Male genitalia: Epandrium nearly split medially, not grading with surrounding membrane; dense cluster of setae ventrally, ascending in a single line toward apex; small lobe projecting on anterolateral margin. Cercus oval shaped, distinct from surrounding membrane; barely protruding beyond distal margin of epandrium in lateral view. Surstylus roughly triangular, ventral half with scattered setulae; 13 peglike prensisetae, apices blunt, comblike; distallateral fingerlike lobe present, length equal to that of prensisetae. Subepandrial sclerite large, broad, trapezoidal, lateral margins thickened; C-shaped in lateral view; subepandrial appendage well developed, apex with thin, mucronate point (in lateral view), subcordate in posterior view. Outer paraphysis heavily sclerotized, formed of 2 lobes, split deeply medially, apex laterally flattened; distal end with sharply curved hook in lateral view, ventrally with preapical lobe; dorsal margin with 2 long spines, distal spine shorter, basal spine curving medially in some specimens; lobes at base in ventral view. Inner paraphysis lost. Aedeagal apodeme nearly wide as long, curved in lateral view; distal end widely flared with a broad emargination. Hypandrium U-shaped, thickness consistent; apex notched, accommodating outer paraphyses; lateral arm with gonopod, oriented posteroventrally. Ejaculatory apodeme very large, equal to or slightly longer than length/depth of epandrium. Head and thorax measurements: (n = 5; Am 2, 3, 5, 1426, 1525) FL/FW 0.72 (0.66–0.77), EL/EW 1.32 (1.22–1.42), EL/CW 10.09 (8.50– 11.57), FML/FMW 0.41 (0.34–0.54), PR /RR 0.57 (0.54–0.70), ThL 1.79 (1.75–1.84 mm). TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype: male: “ 9 mi. SE.” Huachinango, Puebla MEX., [20.062775, -97.962064], M Wasserman, WB Heed, “ June 1952,” 2260:13, Am 2, [glued to paper point, dissected]. Deposited in the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH). Paratypes: “ 9 mi. SE.” Huachinango, Puebla MEX., M Wasserman, WB Heed, “ June 1952,” 2260:13, 2♂ (Am 3*, 5*, AMNH). OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED: Mexico: Chiapas: 5 mi. W San Cristobal, 7500′, 1969-05-06, leg. H.J. Teskey, 1♂ (Am 1426*, CNC); 20 mi N. Bochil, Yerba Buena, 6500′, 1969-06-09 through 1969-06-10, leg. W. R. M. Mason, 1♂ (Am 1264*, CNC). Durango: 14 mi. SW El Salto, 8000′, 1964-06-26, leg. J.F. McAlpine, attracted to man, 1♂ (Am 1525*, CNC). Sinaloa: El Palmito, 6400′, 1964-07-02, leg. J.F. McAlpine, 1♂ (Am 1518*, CNC). ETYMOLOGY: From Latin latus for “wide” and labrum for “lip.” Used as a noun in apposition. In reference to the characteristic wide facial marking of this species. DISTRIBUTION: Amiota latilabrum occurs widely throughout Mexico including the states of Chiapas, Durango, Sinaloa, and Puebla. COMMENTS: This species exhibits the characteristic behavior of attraction to the eyes and face common to many Amiota.

Published as part of Jones, Lance E. & Grimaldi, David A., 2022, Revision Of The Nearctic Species Of The Genus Amiota Loew (Diptera: Drosophilidae), pp. 1-181 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (458) on pages 100-104, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.458.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7400026

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Amiota latilabrum, Diptera, Animalia, Drosophilidae, Biodiversity, Amiota, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
1