Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Three reuse indicators for KB images in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, in a historical perspective (2013-2022)

Authors: Olaf Janssen;

Three reuse indicators for KB images in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, in a historical perspective (2013-2022)

Abstract

Key TakeawayThe key takeaway from this article is that Wikipedia has been an effective platform for improving the findability, visibility, and reusability of images from the heritage collections of KB, the national library of the Netherlands. The article discusses three reuse indicators (KPIs) measured in December 2022 to illustrate this effectiveness. Summary The article discusses the effectiveness of Wikipedia in enhancing the findability, visibility, and reusability of images from KB's heritage collections. The author, Olaf Janssen, presents three key reuse indicators (KPIs) that were measured in December 2022 to evaluate the impact of KB images on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. The article covers the period from 2013 to 2022, showing how KB's image collections have progressively reached a global audience. The three KPIs mentioned in the article are: 1. KPI 2: The number of KB images on Wikimedia Commons. 2. KPI 4: The number of unique Wikipedia articles using those KB images. 3. KPI 8: The number of requests per month for Wikipedia articles containing those KB images. The article provides more detailed analyses and underlying data on the project pages of KB on Dutch Wikipedia. The article also includes links to related files and resources for further exploration. The article is also avialable via Github

Three reuse indicators for KB images in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, in a historical perspective (2013-2022) - Wikipedia is a very effective channel to globally improve the findability, visibility and reusability of images from the heritage collections of KB, the national library of the Netherlands. In this article I will illustrate this, based on three reuse indicators (KPIs) that I measured in December 2022. I will also show that during the period 2013-2022 our image collections have reached ever-increasing global audiences. More detailed analyses and all underlying data used for this article can be found on the project pages of the KB on the Dutch Wikipedia: KPI 2: The number of KB images on Wikimedia Commons KPI 4: The number of unique Wikipedia articles using those images KPI 8: The number of requests for those Wikipedia articles per month See also the 2023 update (added 24 Jan 2024)

Keywords

Wikimedia Commons, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Image reuse, KB, national library of the Netherlands, key figures, KPIs, indicators, Wikipedia, digital heritage, Olaf Janssen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 8
  • 7
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7
8