Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Impact of Satellite Trails on Hubble Space Telescope Observations: satellite classifications

Authors: Kruk, Sandor; Martin, Pablo Garcia; Popescu, Marcel; Aussel, Ben; Dillmann, Steven; Perks, Megan E.; Lund, Tamina; +4 Authors

The Impact of Satellite Trails on Hubble Space Telescope Observations: satellite classifications

Abstract

This repository contains the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations with satellite classifications, released in the paper "The Impact of Satellite Trails on Hubble Space Telescope Observations" (DOI: 10.1038/s41550-023-01903-3). This table contains 114 607 individual HST images taken in the last 19 years and publicly released in the eHST archive by 3 October 2021, with satellite trail classifications made with machine learning and citizen science. We processed the individual images by adding the two ACS/WFC (WFC3/UVIS, respectively) apertures side-by-side, without correcting for geometric distortions and without the gap between the two detectors (hence why the satellite trails can appear discontinuous in the images). Note that these are not original images from the eHST archive, and therefore are not meant for other scientific analysis. The dataset contains 3072 HST images with satellites (2.7% of the dataset) and 3228 satellite trails in total. The classifications were visually inspected and vetted by the authors (images are flagged with the 'satellite' flag). The table contains the following columns: observation IDs: both individual exposures (simple_id) and composite images, multiple individual exposures processed and stacked (composite_id); instrument: ACS/WFC or WFC3/UVIS; start time and end time of exposure; exposure duration; right ascension (ra) and declination (dec); 'satellite' flag [empty otherwise]; no_sat: number of satellites in the image; image URL - URL for the individual HST observations used for satellite classification; additional metadata columns, as available in the eHST archive. The satellites were classified by volunteers on the Hubble Asteroid Hunter citizen science project and with a machine learning classifier. Please cite the paper (Kruk et al., https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01903-3) when using the data in this repository.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 57
    download downloads 49
  • 57
    views
    49
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
57
49
Related to Research communities