Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Qualitative analysis of selected science communication pieces in four languages

Authors: Marín-González, Esther; Navalhas, Inês; Luís, Cristina;

Qualitative analysis of selected science communication pieces in four languages

Abstract

This deliverable reports on the work carried out in the EU research project ENJOI (Engagement and Journalism Innovation for Outstanding Open Science Communication). Specifically, it presents the results of WP2, task 2.4 “Development of a methodology for qualitative analysis of science communication pieces” and task 2.5 “Qualitative analysis of a selection of science communication pieces” both led by FCiências.ID (FC.ID). The main objective of these two tasks was to develop and implement an analytical framework for the qualitative analysis of pieces of science journalism and communication produced and disseminated in traditional and social media (TV, digital media and/or newspapers, Instagram and Youtube). The scope of analysis was on Southern European countries (Italy, Portugal, and Spain), adding another EU perspective (French-speaking Belgium) to cover the four Mediterranean languages present in ENJOI (French, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish). Framed as a small-scale exploratory study, it examines storytelling, narratives, and engagement in science journalism and communication. Additionally, this work contributes to the preliminary Standards, Principles, and Indicators (SPIs) defined by the ENJOI Consortium, through practical examples in use.

ENJOI WP2. Identification of Standards, Principles and Indicators (SPIs) and methodological approach for qualitative analysis of Outstanding Open Science Communication (OOSC)

Keywords

Social media, Journalism, YouTube, Instagram, Climate change, Storytelling, Narratives, Traditional media, Science Communication, ENJOI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 12
    download downloads 16
  • 12
    views
    16
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
12
16
Green
Related to Research communities