Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Behavioral and Rater Prediction Data Associated with 'Better-than-Chance Prediction of Cooperative Behaviour from First and Second Impressions'

Authors: Schniter, Eric; Shields, Timothy W.;

Behavioral and Rater Prediction Data Associated with 'Better-than-Chance Prediction of Cooperative Behaviour from First and Second Impressions'

Abstract

This dataset contains behavioral and rater data collected across two studies. The first component comprises behavioral data from a repeated Split-or-Take-All Prisoner's Dilemma experiment conducted at the Economic Science Institute (ESI), Chapman University. Anonymously paired participants chose to either cooperate ("Split") or defect ("Take All") across two rounds, with payoffs determined by the combination of both players' choices: mutual Split yielded 5 USD to each player, mutual Take All yielded 0 USD to each, and mismatched choices awarded 10 USD to the defector and 0 USDto the cooperator. The dataset includes participant choices, partner choices, and round-by-round outcomes. The second component comprises data from an online rater prediction study conducted via Prolific, in which observers predicted participants' Round 1 and Round 2 choices across conditions varying access to visual and behavioral information. This component includes rater predictions, prediction accuracy measures, and demographic variables. These data support research on cooperative behavior, reciprocity, social prediction, and strategic decision-making in repeated social dilemmas. Researchers interested in prisoner's dilemma dynamics, conditional cooperation, impression formation, or behavioral prediction may find this dataset useful. Associated publications are listed under Related Identifiers. Thin-slice video clips and photographs of participants recorded immediately prior to their decisions are archived separately (see Related Identifiers). A restricted-access record linking visual stimuli to participant behavioral data is available upon approved request. For questions about the data, contact Eric Schniter (schniter@chapman.edu), Economic Science Institute, Chapman University.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mind reading, Prediction, Cheater detection, Cooperation, Prisoner's dilemma

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 19
  • 19
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
19