Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Myrmapana costaricaensis Pekár 2022, sp. nov.

Authors: Pekár, Stano;

Myrmapana costaricaensis Pekár 2022, sp. nov.

Abstract

Myrmapana costaricaensis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 4FBB9658-87A4-4519-B9D7-CB83DDAA37AA Figs 1A–B, D, 2–3 Diagnosis Males of M. costaricaensis sp. nov. are most similar in the shape of sexual organs to M. parallela. Males of M. costaricaensis differ from this species by a protuberance at the anterior margin of the cheliceral fang, the shape of the first strong tooth, and a sinusiodal RTA (Galiano 1969: figs 33, 43). Females can be recognised by spermathecae without prominent insemination ducts (“pipes”, see Prószyński 2016). Etymology The name is derived from the country of origin. Type material Holotype COSTA RICA – Heredia Province • ♂; Puerto Viejo de Sarapiquí, La Selva Biological Station and Reserve; 10°25.87145′ N, 84°0.45123′ W; 25 Apr. 2015; G. Corcobado leg.; leaves of tropical plants; NMP (P6A 7397). Paratypes COSTA RICA – Heredia Province • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; 15 Apr. 2015; NMP (P6A 7398) • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; MUB • 3 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 16 Apr. 2015; MUB • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 25 Apr. 2015; MUB • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 7 May 2015; MUB • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; 8 May 2015; MUB. – Puntarenas Province • 1 ♂; La Gamba; Feb. 2012; E. Líznarová leg.; MUB. Other material examined COSTA RICA – Heredia Province • 2 juvs; same collection data as for holotype; 16 Apr. 2015; MUB • 3 juvs; same collection data as for preceding; 25 Apr. 2015; MUB • 1 juv.; same collection data as for preceding; 7 May 2015; MUB • 1 juv.; same collection data as for preceding; 8 May 2015; MUB. – Puntarenas Province • 3 juvs; La Gamba; Feb. 2012; E. Líznarová leg.; MUB. Description Male MEASUREMENTS (N = 9). Total body length 9.18 (6.70–10.70) mm; carapace 2.55 (1.49–2.97) mm long, 1.52 (1.16–1.67) mm wide; basal segment of chelicera 3.43 (2.27–4.05) mm long, 0.48 mm wide, cheliceral fang 3.35 mm long; abdomen 2.71 (1.53–3.67) mm long, 1.20 mm wide; labium 0.88 mm long; sternum 1.44 mm long, 0.40 mm wide. Diameter of eyes: AME = 0.42 mm, ALE = 0.21 mm, PME = 0.07 mm, PLE = 0.25 mm. Leg segments (mm): palp (0.77, 0.39, 0.49, 0.63), I (1.99, 1.04, 2.15, 0.79, 0.40), II (1.44, 0.72, 1.11, 0.72, 0.48), III (1.36, 0.56, 0.96, 0.72, 0.48), IV (1.84, 0.64, 1.60, 1.60, 0.56). COLOUR. Chelicerae basal segment dark-brown with orange-brown distal tip, reticulated dorsally (Fig. 1A), covered with white sparse setae, fangs orange-brown, carapace dark-brown mostly covered by white setae, with brown spot in front of fovea, eyes surrounded by black patches; wedge of white setae on lateral sides behind head; sternum, endites light-brown; palpal Fe and Pt light-brown, palpal Ti and Ta dark-brown, all Cx pale, all Fe light-brown to dark-brown, all Pt pale, Ti I and II pale, Ti III and IV brown, Mt I dark-brown, all other Mt pale, all Ta pale, labium and gnathocoxae brown; abdomen dark-brown with white setae. MORPHOLOGY. Chelicerae protruding, longer than cephalothorax, with 14 teeth on prolateral margin, the first teeth strong, triangular; fangs straight, at base with dorsal protuberance, tip curved (Fig. 3A); cephalothorax elongated (Fig. 1A), cephalic part dorsally flat and slightly higher than thoracic part which is hump-shaped; sternum elongated. Leg spines: Ti I ventrally 2.2.2.2.2.2.2, Mt I ventrally 2.2, Ti II ventrally 2.1, Mt II ventrally 2.2, Mt III and IV ventrally 2. Abdomen elongated with a constriction about one third of its length and two dorsal scuta (Fig. 1A). Palpal cymbium oval, with one apical spine, tegulum large, oval as wide as cymbium, embolus coiled 2 times, tip of embolus straight, pointing laterally (Figs 2B, 3B); RTA elongated, sinusoid apically pointed (Figs 2D, 3C). Female MEASUREMENTS (N = 11). Total body 7.18 (5.40–7.34) mm, carapace 2.55 (2.48–2.96) mm long, 1.27 (1.08–1.39) mm wide, chelicera 0.63 (0.58–0.71) mm long, abdomen 2.87 (2.11–3.78) mm long, 1.20 mm wide; labium 0.49 mm long; sternum 1.27 mm long, 0.40 mm wide. Diameters of eyes: AME = 0.46 mm, ALE = 0.25 mm, PME = 0.07 mm, PLE = 0.25 mm. Leg segments (mm): palp (0.60, 0.31, 0.42, 0.60), I (1.52, 0.79, 1.60, 0.64, 0.40), II (1.12, 0.56, 1.04, 0.56, 0.48), III (1.28, 0.56, 0.96, 1.12, 0.48), IV (1.68, 0.56, 1.60, 1.52, 0.48). COLOUR. As in males but abdomen ventrally pale (Fig. 1B). MORPHOLOGY. As in males but chelicerae small, lateral margin of chelicerae with 6 teeth, retrolateral margin with 5 teeth; palpal Ta and Ti flattened (Fig. 1B, D); thoracic part of cephalothorax only slightly lower than cephalic part (Fig. 2A); abdomen with a single scutum. Epigyne with two large atria separated by a septum, atria approx. 1.5 times as wide as septum, median pocket rather triangular, situated below septum (Figs 2C, 3D); spermathecae large, oval, situated in the upper part of septum (Fig. 3E), without prominent insemination ducts. Variation The dark form is represented by both sexes (Fig. 1A–B), whereas the light form is known only in females (Fig. 1D). The two forms differ only by colouration. In the light form, palpal segments and carapace are orange-brown with dark spots around eyes, Fe I pale, frontal half of abdomen yellow, hind part dark-brown. Natural history This species was collected from tree foliage. The dark form appears to resemble Neoponera unidentata Mayr, 1862 ants (Fig. 1C), while the light form resembles Pseudomyrmex sp. ants (Fig. 1E). Barcode COI of this species is deposited in Genbank, accession no. OM321384. Distribution Known only from type locality in Costa Rica.

Published as part of Pekár, Stano, 2022, Two new ant-mimicking spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Costa Rica, pp. 31-42 in European Journal of Taxonomy 852 (1) on pages 33-37, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.852.2005, http://zenodo.org/record/7448120

Related Organizations
Keywords

Arthropoda, Salticidae, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Myrmapana costaricaensis, Myrmapana, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green