Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Read it on medium (recommended). In academia, authorship can be a touchy subject that is all too easy to sidestep. However, it’s always simpler to have a contentious conversation prior to submission. Authorship can be a sensitive topic in academia, but let’s talk about it. My goal with this post is to throw out ideas and open paths for discussion, thus helping break the taboos around this topic and putting to rest some misconceptions. Discussion and prevention are always preferable to addressing issues after they arise. And authorship discussions don’t have to be as frosty as a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Emmanuel Macron.
PhDchat, academic chatter, biology, publishing, academia, science communication, authorship, science
PhDchat, academic chatter, biology, publishing, academia, science communication, authorship, science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 12 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts