Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In NorCPM runs we currently assimilate data every month centered (in the middle of the month) and we correct the instantaneous restart file based on the monthly averaged of that month. It implies that we compare monthly average observations with instantaneous model snapshot. This approach is compared to shifting the assimilation at the end of the month (assimilating past monthly observations) and comparing monthly average observation with model monthly average. Also, one corrects the initial condition at the start of the hindcast instead of 15 days earlier. For reanalysis, assimilating data in the middle of the month outperforms the scheme where data is assimilated at the end of the month. No significant difference is found between the two schemes for seasonal prediction skill.
NERSC Technical Report no. 400
Prediction skill, Assimilation cycle, Data assimilation, Forecast, NorCPM, Climate model
Prediction skill, Assimilation cycle, Data assimilation, Forecast, NorCPM, Climate model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| downloads | 11 |

Downloads provided by UsageCounts