Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Model Reproducibility Study on Left Atrial Fibres

Authors: Solis Lemus, Jose Alonso; Baptiste, Tiffany; Barrows, Rosie; Sillet, Charles; Gharaviri, Ali; Raffaele, Giulia; Razeghi, Orod; +8 Authors

Model Reproducibility Study on Left Atrial Fibres

Abstract

This dataset contains 100 models of the left atrium. Models come from 50 distinct patients, divided amongst 5 users to assess for inter- and intra-operator variability. The split used was 30 pairs (60 models) for inter-operator variability and 20 pairs (40 models) for intra operator variability. Models were created with a specific version of the software CemrgApp (cemrgapp.com), in which users processed a contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram, and a late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) contrast magnetic resonance (CMR). Two types of simulations were run on each of the 100 processed cases: baseline pacing to calculate local activation time (LAT) maps and atrial fibrillation simulations for which phase singularity (PS) maps were calculated. The openCARP simulator (Plank et al., 2021) was used to run the simulations, using the Courtemance human atrial model with AF electrical remodelling. This dataset contains the labelled surface meshes, output to the CemrgApp software, which in turn are utilised as inputs for the electrophisiological simulations. The dataset is split into 100 folders labelled M1 to M100. Included in file `Cases_and_Users_Paths.csv` is the pairs for each of the comparisons, whether inter- or intra-observer variability.

{"references": ["Razeghi, et al. (2020). CemrgApp: An interactive medical imaging application with image processing, computer vision, and machine learning toolkits for cardiovascular research. DOI:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100570", "Plank, et al. (2021). The openCARP simulation environment for cardiac electrophysiology. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106223."]}

Additional funding acknowledgements: British Heart Foundation (PG/15/91/31812, and PG/13/37/30280). Kings Health Partners London National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre. National Institute of Health (NIH) (R01-HL152256)

Keywords

Patient-specific cardiac models, reproducibiility, image analysis, heart model, electrophysiology, atrial meshes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 16
    download downloads 17
  • 16
    views
    17
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
16
17