Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Advanced Research
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE IN DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AN INVITRO STUDY

Authors: Aasima Ishaq; Mohd Altaf Tantray; Hassan Mydeen A.;

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE IN DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AN INVITRO STUDY

Abstract

Introduction: Microleakage is one of the most frequent cause behind a restoration failure. Numerous advancements in restorative materials and placement techniques have been made to overcome this problem. Aim And Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the microleakage of three different restorative materials with different chemical structure and to determine which among the three has more sealing ability. Materials And Methods: Thirtyextracted mandibular 3rd molars were stored in distilled water and standardized class 1 cavity preparation was done. All the 30 samples were divided into 3 experimental groups GROUP I (GIC), GROUP II (ORMOCER), GROUP III (CENTION N) 10 sample in each group. Teeth were buccolingually sectioned in two halves and immersed in 2% basic fuschin dye and micro leakage was assessed under stereomicroscope. Results: IN our invitro study the highest microleakage was observed in GIC (1.5±0.849) followed by Cention n (0.7± 0.6749) and Ormocer (0.3± 0.483) respectively.Significant difference was observed in group I and group II with p value of 0.0005. Conclusion: Better sealing ability were observed in Ormocer>Cention-n>GIC.

Keywords

Ormocer Cention -n GIC Microleakage SEM

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    download downloads 11
  • 11
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
11
Green
gold