Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Introduction: Microleakage is one of the most frequent cause behind a restoration failure. Numerous advancements in restorative materials and placement techniques have been made to overcome this problem. Aim And Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the microleakage of three different restorative materials with different chemical structure and to determine which among the three has more sealing ability. Materials And Methods: Thirtyextracted mandibular 3rd molars were stored in distilled water and standardized class 1 cavity preparation was done. All the 30 samples were divided into 3 experimental groups GROUP I (GIC), GROUP II (ORMOCER), GROUP III (CENTION N) 10 sample in each group. Teeth were buccolingually sectioned in two halves and immersed in 2% basic fuschin dye and micro leakage was assessed under stereomicroscope. Results: IN our invitro study the highest microleakage was observed in GIC (1.5±0.849) followed by Cention n (0.7± 0.6749) and Ormocer (0.3± 0.483) respectively.Significant difference was observed in group I and group II with p value of 0.0005. Conclusion: Better sealing ability were observed in Ormocer>Cention-n>GIC.
Ormocer Cention -n GIC Microleakage SEM
Ormocer Cention -n GIC Microleakage SEM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| downloads | 11 |

Downloads provided by UsageCounts