Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Data sharing is increasingly regarded as necessary and a signifier of institutional and scientific success. Therefore, institutions need guidance to assess their capacity for data sharing and ability to respond to new opportunities. Maturity models are often used in healthcare informatics as roadmaps to help organizations evaluate their current capabilities and plan for further evolution and growth concerning the adoption of digital technology. This approach offers a structured and familiar method for portraying and assessing institutional data sharing maturity. The research data sharing maturity model describes five maturity levels across seven domains: process and procedures, governance, organizational culture, infrastructure, workforce development, data quality and reuse, and data ethics practices, outlining the specific characteristics of each. The levels progress from Level 1, characterized by ad hoc work and resource use, up to Level 5, characterized by stable and continuously improved capabilities.
This work was supported by: NIH/NCATS UL1TR001422, UL1TR002544, and the National Center for Data to Health (CD2H) U24TR002306. The graphical layout of the model was inspired by SPACE to evolve academic assessment: A rubric for analyzing institutional conditions and progress indicators.
{"references": ["Anna Hatch, & Ruth Schmidt. (2021). SPACE to evolve academic assessment: A rubric for analyzing institutional conditions and progress indicators. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4927605"]}
data sharing, open science, FAIR, informatics, research data governance
data sharing, open science, FAIR, informatics, research data governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 215 | |
| downloads | 56 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts