{"references": ["1.\tDONGOROZ, V. Drept penal. Bucure\u015fti: Socec & Co., 1939. 772 p.", "2.\tGRAMA, M.; BOTNARU, S.; \u0218AVGA, A.; \u0219.a. Drept penal. Partea general\u0103. Vol. I, Chi\u0219in\u0103u: Tipografia Central\u0103, 2012. 328 p.", "3.\t\u0415\u0420\u041c\u0410\u041a\u041e\u0412\u0410, \u041b.\u0414. \u0438 \u0434\u0440. \u0423\u0433\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0420\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0424\u0435\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438: \u041e\u0431\u0449\u0430\u044f \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u044c / \u041f\u043e\u0434 \u0440\u0435\u0434. \u0410.\u0418. \u0420\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0430. \u041c\u043e\u0441\u043a\u0432\u0430: \u042e\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442, 2001. 511 \u0441.", "4.\tHAD\u00ceRC\u0102, I. R\u0103spunderea pentru infrac\u021biunile s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219ite \u00een sfera circula\u021biei substan\u021belor narcotice, psihotrope, a analoagelor \u0219i precursorilor acestora. Chi\u015fin\u0103u: CEP USM, 2008. 281 p", "5.\tPASCU, I., DOBRINOIU, V., HOTCA, M.A., \u0219.a. Noul Cod penal comentat, edi\u021bia a 2-a, rev\u0103zut\u0103 \u0219i ad\u0103ugit\u0103, vol. II: Partea Special\u0103. Bucure\u0219ti: Universul juridic, 2014. 1154 p.", "6.\tDecizia Cur\u021bii de Apel Chi\u0219in\u0103u din 26.06.2020.Dosarul nr.1a-1559/2019.[Accesat: 10.03.2022] Disponibil: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/a945d227-940c-4e22-95a6-b6500a27b6d5", "7.\tDecizia Cur\u021bii de Apel Chi\u0219in\u0103u din 23.06.2020. Dosarul nr.1a-107/2021.[Accesat: 10.03.2022] Disponibil: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/3e1b4cea-6055-47f1-902a-84b62f71af79", "8.\tDecizia Cur\u021bii de Apel Chi\u0219in\u0103u din 08.09.2021.Dosarul nr.1a-1325/21.[Accesat: 10.03.2022] Disponibil: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/5c6c4c9b-2bea-42b7-9ee3-e4b6a07f744a", "9.\tBR\u00ceNZA, S., STATI, V. Tratat de drept penal. Partea special\u0103, vol. I. Chi\u0219in\u0103u: Tipografia Central\u0103, 2015. 1328 p.", "10.\tM\u0102RCULESCU-MICHINICI, M.-I., DUNEA, M. Drept penal. Partea general\u0103. Bucure\u0219ti: Hamangiu, 2017.\u2013 968 p.", "11.\tCOPE\u021aCHI S., HAD\u00ceRCA, I. Calificarea infrac\u0163iunilor: note de curs. Chi\u015fin\u0103u: Tipografia Central\u0103, 2015. 352 p.", "10. T\u0102NASE, A. Delimitarea traficului de fiin\u021be umane de unele infrac\u021biuni adiacente. \u00cen: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae, 2011 nr. 3(43), p. 221-236."]}

This article is dedicated to the analysis of the subjective side of the crime of forced labor through the prism of the signs that characterize it: guilt, purpose, reason. Among other things, it is argued that the crime of forced labor is usually committed with direct intent. Only in the case described in letter b) paragraph (3) art.168 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, the perpetrator manifests intent towards the prejudicial act and imprudence towards the prejudicial consequences. The purpose of the crime is not a mandatory sign of the subjective side of the crime of forced labor. As a rule, the reason for the crime is not relevant to the classification of the crime of forced labor, with the exception of the hypothesis described in paragraph (2) letter e) art.168 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, which establishes the aggravation of responsibility for the commission of the crime for reasons of prejudice - case in which, the reason for the crime constitutes a mandatory sign of the subjective side of the examined crime.