Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["1.\tGhid de expertize judiciare. Coord. M. Gheorghi\u021b\u0103. Chi\u0219in\u0103u:\"Angela Levin\u021ba\", 2005. 103 p.", "2.\t\u0411\u0415\u041b\u041a\u0418\u041d, \u0420.\u0421. \u0421\u0443\u0449\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432 \u0441\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c \u0443\u0433\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u0435 \u0438 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0435. \u041c\u043e\u0441\u043a\u0432\u0430: \u042e\u0440\u0438\u0434. \u041b\u0438\u0442-\u0440\u0430, 1961. 250 \u0441.", "3.\t\u0428\u041b\u042f\u0425\u041e\u0412, \u0410.\u0420. \u0421\u0442\u0440\u0443\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0440\u0430 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0438\u0441\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u0433\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0432\u044b\u0432\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0432 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0430-\u043a\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0430. \u0412: \u0422\u0440\u0443\u0434\u044b \u0412\u041d\u0418\u0418\u0421\u042d, \u0412\u044b\u043f.4. \u041c\u043e\u0441\u043a\u0432\u0430, 1973, \u0441. 20-32.", "4.\t\u0414\u0423\u041b\u041e\u0412, \u0410.\u0412. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0438 \u043e\u0431\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0437\u044b. \u041c\u0438\u043d\u0441\u043a, 1962, 137 \u0441.", "5.\tLegea Republicii Moldova Cu privire la expertiza judiciar\u0103 \u015fi statutul expertului judiciar nr.68 din 14.04.2016. \u00cen: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova nr. 157-162/316.", "BELIBOV, L., FLOREA, L., GROSU, V. Metodele de verificare \u0219i apreciere a raportului de expertiz\u0103 judiciar\u0103 de c\u0103tre ordonator. \u00cen: Legea \u0219i via\u021ba, octombrie, 2019, p. 55-60.", "7.\tCodul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 al Republicii Moldova, adoptat prin Legea Republicii Moldova, nr.122-XV din 14.03.2003. \u00cen: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, nr.104-110.", "8.\tVOINEA, D. Principalele criterii de apreciere \u0219i valorificare a expertizelor criminalistice \u00een procesul penal. \u00cen: Revista Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de criminalistic\u0103. Nr.5, 2013, p.1425-1427.", "9.\tLegea Republicii Moldova Cu privire la expertiza judiciar\u0103 \u015fi statutul expertului judiciar nr.68 din 14.04.2016. \u00cen: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova nr. 157-162/316.", "10.\tLegea Republicii Moldova Cu privire la expertiza judiciar\u0103 \u015fi statutul expertului judiciar nr.68 din 14.04.2016. \u00cen: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova nr. 157-162/316.", "11.\tRaportul de expertiz\u0103 al CNEJ al MJ RM nr.1653/103 din 21.07.2015 pe cauza penal\u0103 nr.20143300608.", "12.\tRaportul de expertiz\u0103 repetat\u0103 nr.9431 din 02.10.2015 al CTCEJ al IGP MAI RM pe cauza civil\u0103 2-331/15.", "13.\tCodul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 al Republicii Moldova, adoptat prin Legea Republicii Moldova, nr.122-XV din 14.03.2003. \u00cen: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, nr.104-110.", "14.\tMARTIN, J-C. et al. Investigation de scene de crime. 3 e edition revue et augmentee. Lausanne: PPUR, 2010. 237 p.", "15.\tDOLEA, I. Drepturile persoanei \u00een probatoriul penal: conceptul promov\u0103rii elementului privat. Chi\u0219in\u0103u: Cartea Juridic\u0103, 2009. 416 p.", "16.\tRaportul de expertiz\u0103 grafoscopic\u0103 al CEXIN, nr.032 din 27.01.2014 pe cauza penal\u0103 nr.2011515143 a SUP IP Ciocana.", "17.\tRaportul de expertiz\u0103 CEXIN, nr.105 din 19.02.2014 pe cauza civil\u0103 nr.2-3032/13 a Judec\u0103toriei Botanica, mun. Chi\u0219in\u0103u.", "18.\tCATARAGA O. et al. Metodica tip de efectuare a expertizei judiciare grafoscopice. Cod MT 4.01, adoptat\u0103 la 10.04.2017 de C\u0218M al CNEJ de pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 MJ al RM.", "19. OSOIANU, T. et al. Tactica ac\u021biunilor de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103. Chi\u0219in\u0103u: Cartea Militar\u0103, 2020. 339 p."]}
The author of the present work analyses the notion and the structure of the forensic expertise report, the particularities of the graphological expertise report, in particular, taking into account the present penal-processual legislation of the Republic of Moldova and the judicial practice regarding the judicial expertise of the handwriting and signature. He brings arguments in favour of a legislation suggestion of improving and optimisation of the graphological expertise report and its evaluation by the criminal investigation authority and the judge.
expertise report evaluation, graphological expertise
expertise report evaluation, graphological expertise
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts