
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This letter was submitted to PNAS as a Letter to the Editor on behalf of the 260 co-authors working in the field of animal behaviour and welfare, in response to their publication of the article by Margaret S. Livingstone: “Triggers for Mother Love” (1), published in PNAS on September 19th 2022. They declined to publish it. We store it here to maintain a public record of our response and the strength of collective feeling in our field that journals today have a responsibility to address unethical practices, such as mother-infant separation, to recognise the poor quality of research standards they promote, as well as their failure to advance scientific knowledge.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 360 | |
downloads | 101 |