
In formal verification, qualitative and quantitative aspects are both relevant, and high-level formalisms are convenient to naturally specify the systems under study and their properties. In the paper associated to this artifact, we present a framework for describing probabilistic models on top of nondeterministic specifications in the highly-expressive language Maude, based on rewriting logic. Quantitative properties can be checked and calculated on them using both probabilistic and statistical methods with external tools like PRISM, Storm, MultiVeSta, and custom implementations as backends. At the same time, the underlying nondeterministic system can be verified using the qualitative model-checking and deductive tools already available in Maude. This is the artifact of the paper "QMaude: quantitative specification and verification in rewriting logic", accepted in the 25th International Symposium on Formal Methods (FM 2023). It consists of a ready-to-use Docker image based on Ubuntu 22.04 with the proposed tool umaudemc and the collection of examples mentioned in the paper. Scripts are provided for reproducing its executions and experiments, and to rebuild the Docker image itself. The user manual of the tool is also included in the bundle. Erratum: the profiling results obtained in the artifact for the pcheck command with Stormpy as backend are not accurate because of an omission in one of the scripts. It can be solved by inserting the line sed -i 's/[stormpy.model_checking(model/[stormpy_wrapper(model/' "$STORMPY" in the /opt/fm2023/section-8-pcheck.sh script.
Research partially supported by the Spanish AEI through project ProCode (PID2019-108528RB-C22/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). Rubén Rubio was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Universities through grants FPU17/02319 and EST21/00536.
Maude, Rewriting logic, Statistical model checking, Probabilistic model checking
Maude, Rewriting logic, Statistical model checking, Probabilistic model checking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
